jewels Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 As things are my 75 Gallon {Fluval 405 + 2 powerheads} will consume about 85 ppm of Nitrate each week. If it is the plants enjoying the N; then great ! At he same time - how much KNO3 am I adding simply to support the 405 ? If my 405 is hogging Nitrates it seems silly to pay for dry ferts and electricity just to rob my plants :bang1: Kind of a scary leap but, , , If I had enough plants in an aquarium could I skip the media holding filters and switch to power heads only? Anyone try it ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wingin' It Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 I'm pretty sure you can. Fleshgear has a similar set up. Can't remember what he called it, but there's enough plants in there to keep things healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vallisneria Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Maybe i'm missing something but why would your Fluval be using Nitrates? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baos Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 I recommend you buy this book immediately! http://www.amazon.ca/Ecology-Planted-Aquarium-Diana-Walstad/dp/0967377315 You have a lot to learn and this book could be your new Bible. Plus save you future headaches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kronosdelsol Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 (edited) Vallisneria is right. The plants consume the nitrates and its the filter's good bacteria that converts the harmful nitrite (NO2) into nitrate (NO3). We do water changes to remove nitrates, but in a planted tank you don't need to. Unless of course you are over dosing the nitrates and it is affecting your fauna. Water changes are good, unless you are going El Natural. Lost everyone yet? Yes you should be okay without a filter. You only need it for mechanical filtration. Many people have success with it as long as you have a low fauna community and semi amount of plants. Rhonda Wilson popularized this. I had no filter or way of moving water in my tanks for a long time. There was no problem assuming you have a low fauna population. Diana Walstad's book is a good read but not for everyone. She offers a low tech setup which uses low light, mineralized soil substrate, no water changes, low fish population. You would also be limited to certain plants. Some people have success with it, others don't. It ultimately comes down to how your plants are currently getting their nutrients and how fast you want your plants to grow and look. Maybe provide more details on your setup. Edited April 17, 2010 by Kronosdelsol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werner Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Your filter won't be hogging nitrates. Of course, nitrates are the end product of the biological filtration process, so I'm guessing you mean nitrogenous compounds in general. The plants prefer to get their N as ammonia/ammonium (more efficient to process than nitrite or nitrate.) Since they'll be using it directly from the fish, there will be little (none?) available for the filter bacteria, and the colony is limited. With enough healthy plants, your filter will be used mostly for mechanical filtration and water movement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvision Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 On a well planted tank, you don't need a lot of biological filtration. However, I have found that if you have a good amount of biofiltration available, your chances of Green Water in a planted tank are quite low. Your plants will be consuming as much NH3 and NO2 as they can, but will leave a small amount for the filter. And, the NO3 the filter does produce will be consumed by the plants. My tanks have too many plants and don't get enough N from the biological processes, so I add some a few times per week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jewels Posted April 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Great replies, thanks folks !! Despite my misdirection , you got the jist of things Your plants will be consuming as much NH3 and NO2 as they can, ,,,. And, the NO3 the filter does produce will be consumed by the plants. This quote sums up my glaring faux pas. I am adding all this KNO3to compensate for the lack within the water. If the 405 was not converting this Ammonia and Nitrite would there not be more available for the plants? To rephrase Is my Fluval hogging Ammonia and Nitrite that would otherwise be uptaken by my plants without the fluval could I get away with adding less KNO3 ? 48 inch 75 gallon 6 inch substrate :exspanded clay ( AP.com & Shultz's pond ), prehistoric peat, zeolite, worm casings, spahgnum peat 400 watt Ushio 5500K metal Halide & 6 X 20 watt 6500K T4 for 12 hours/day adding 5 grams of KNO3 everyday ( considering increasing) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.